Agency and Employee Accountability in Cases of Negligence: The Legal Issues of Employee Credibility and Training
[ send me this paper ]
An 8 page assertion that our educational arena has been subject to many challenges and disappointments. At the center of many of these is the issues of employee credibility and training. That the educational system has a problem is not an issue of contention. What is questionable in the current day legal environment, however, is whether or not employees and school districts can be held legally liable for the educational inadequacies which result from inadequate teacher qualifications and training. This paper utilizes the Supreme Court cases of Monroe Vs Pape (1961), Monell Vs Dept of Social Services (1978), City Of Oklahoma Vs Tuttle (1984), Daniels Vs Willaims (1986), Davidson Vs Cannon (1986), and City of Springfield Vs Kibbe (1987) to add insight to that question. All illustrate the delicate balance between employee liability and negligence on the part of the agency when employee credibility is challenged. Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Filename: PPcivRt2.rtf

	< Previous Paper   Next Paper >
Related Research Papers and Reports: Skeet Shooting & Pollution 1971 Montreal Convention: A Legal Brief Aaron B. Cooley v. Board of Wardens of the Port of Philadelphia An Appeal to the Utah Court of Appeals: Antibigamy Laws An Outline for an Appeal to the House of Lords Analyzing Three Cases According To Michael A. Berch's "Introduction To Legal Method And Process