Jack-in-the-Box / Who is Responsible for Consumer Protection ?
[ send me this paper ]
A 6 page paper positing that although Jack-in-the-Box seems to be altruistic in its considerations of the harm it caused its customers, the federal government has not been as conscientious--they have said that responsibility for consumer protection resides in at the state government level. According to Kant and consumer protection groups, there is an inherent danger in this, as despotism is alive at the state level, and that many states are governed arbitrarily by people with special interests. Given this situation, via Kant's advice, it behooves consumers to continue policing all levels of government in order to find the protection from harm to which they are entitled. Bibliography lists 6 sources.
Filename: Jackbox.wps

	< Previous Paper   Next Paper >
Related Research Papers and Reports: Television Commercials / 1950s vs. 1990s Keki Bhote/Beyond Customer Satisfaction to Customer Loyalty Waste Minimization Kant’s Categorical Imperative and the Case of the Ford Pinto THORNTONS AND MARKETING Bell Atlantic Launches Long Distance Service